Sectors
Jurisdictions
- Australia
- Brunei
- Cambodia
- China
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Japan
- Laos
- Macau
- Malaysia
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- New Zealand
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Sri Lanka
- Taiwan
- Thailand
- Vietnam
- East Timor
- Bangladesh
- Azerbaijan
- Kazakhstan
- Tajikistan
- Egypt
- Cyprus
- Iran
- Israel
- Lebanon
- Kuwait
- Oman
- Jordan
- Bahrain
- Qatar
- Saudi Arabia
- Syria
- UAE
- Turkey
- Pacific Islands
- Russia
- France
- UK
- Canada
- USA
- Latin America
- Africa
Reshaping the Perception of the Strength of Indian IP law
Issued: September 13 2016India has been on the receiving end of recent criticism from both the United States Trade Representative and the Global Intellectual Property Center. Pravin Anand and Vaishali Mittal argue that the poor rankings no longer accurately reflect the realities of India’s IP regime.
Related Articles
- NRDC Hands Qualcomm Record US$975 Fine
China’s National Development and Reform Commission has imposed significant ines on Qualcomm for abusing its dominant position in the CD...
- Replacing the 25 Percent Rule: A Guide t...
Finding and analyzing fact-based evidence may provide the most defensible method for approximating royalty rates in the wake of recent ...
- Bilski Ruling Welcome News for Asian Cle...
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski v. Kappos is good news for clean energy innovators in Asia, and is expected to spur innovatio...
- Indonesia’s Improving IP Regime
With a newly-installed IP Arbitration Board and a rewritten trademark law looming, might Indonesia find itself with an improving global...
- Updating the Elephant
India is slowly bringing more transparency and clarity to its IP regime. However, despite international-quality legislation and a more ...
- The 2013 Asia IP Trademark Survey
Southeast Asia
Law Firms
Most Read Articles
Magazine Issues
Tags
Baker & McKenzie USPTO WIPO DLA Piper Tilleke & Gibbins Anand and Anand TRIPS Delhi High Court Rouse IPOS Remfry & Sagar Hogan Lovells WTO PCT SIPO Spruson & Ferguson KIPO Bird & Bird Lex Orbis EPO Lall Lahiri & Salhotra Krishna & Saurastri Anaqua INTA IPAB JPO Davies Collison Cave patrick mirandah co King & Wood Mallesons AJ Park Kim & Chang Indian Patent Office Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe Shearn Delamore & Co Deacons Madrid Protocol Tay & Partners Chang Tsi & Partners Pinsent Masons LLS Lee & Ko Khaitan & Co Blake Dawson USTR K&L Gates Drew & Napier TIPO Allen & Gledhill Griffith Hack Lee and Li