Sectors
Jurisdictions
- Australia
- Brunei
- Cambodia
- China
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Japan
- Laos
- Macau
- Malaysia
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- New Zealand
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Sri Lanka
- Taiwan
- Thailand
- Vietnam
- East Timor
- Bangladesh
- Azerbaijan
- Kazakhstan
- Tajikistan
- Egypt
- Cyprus
- Iran
- Israel
- Lebanon
- Kuwait
- Oman
- Jordan
- Bahrain
- Qatar
- Saudi Arabia
- Syria
- UAE
- Turkey
- Pacific Islands
- Russia
- France
- UK
- Canada
- USA
- Latin America
- Africa
Could Do Better
Issued: February 01 2013After an exciting year in 2012, IP practitioners in India share their concerns over the country’s IP infrastructure and enforcement, and share their ideas on possible solutions. Anna Zhang reports.
Related Articles
- Role of Key Design Features in Design Pa...
When evaluating design patent infringement, it is important to not only compare the infringing product with the cited prior design, but...
- All the World’s a Stage
Amendments to India’s copyright laws provide new opportunities for the Indian creative community to protect their work. Tanvi Misra rep...
- Biological Resources of India
The protection of biological resources, their access and regulation and the application of benefit sharing principles are still in the ...
- Chinese Domain Name Registrations and Yo...
With Chinese-language websites expected to begin using a new .中国 domain later this year, brand owners who need to reach Chinese interne...
- Determination of Infringement for Multip...
In China, the situation where multiple subjects separately implement a method patent is increasing, and the infringement determination ...
- Indian Court Reads ‘Wilfulness’ into Sec...
In a breakthrough decision with significant implications for patent prosecution in India, an Indian court has read “wilfulness” into Se...
Law Firms
Most Read Articles
Magazine Issues
Tags
Baker & McKenzie USPTO WIPO DLA Piper Tilleke & Gibbins Anand and Anand TRIPS Delhi High Court Rouse IPOS Remfry & Sagar Hogan Lovells WTO PCT SIPO Spruson & Ferguson KIPO Bird & Bird Lex Orbis EPO Lall Lahiri & Salhotra Krishna & Saurastri Anaqua INTA IPAB JPO Davies Collison Cave patrick mirandah co King & Wood Mallesons AJ Park Kim & Chang Indian Patent Office Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe Shearn Delamore & Co Deacons Madrid Protocol Tay & Partners Chang Tsi & Partners Pinsent Masons LLS Lee & Ko Khaitan & Co Blake Dawson USTR K&L Gates Drew & Napier TIPO Allen & Gledhill Griffith Hack Lee and Li