Sectors
Jurisdictions
- Australia
- Brunei
- Cambodia
- China
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Japan
- Laos
- Macau
- Malaysia
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- New Zealand
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Sri Lanka
- Taiwan
- Thailand
- Vietnam
- East Timor
- Bangladesh
- Azerbaijan
- Kazakhstan
- Tajikistan
- Egypt
- Cyprus
- Iran
- Israel
- Lebanon
- Kuwait
- Oman
- Jordan
- Bahrain
- Qatar
- Saudi Arabia
- Syria
- UAE
- Turkey
- Pacific Islands
- Russia
- France
- UK
- Canada
- USA
- Latin America
- Africa
Facebook Protection Only for Companies that Join
Issued: September 01 2009Companies which were promised the chance to protect their trade marks from being used as Facebook addresses have been told they can now only do so by signing up for a Facebook page, say lawyers at Pinsent Masons.
When Facebook allowed users to customise web addresses to include their name after the domain name Facebook.com, it said that it was putting protections in place to ensure that trademarks were not used in URLs registered by people who did not own the trademarks, Pinsent Masons lawyers wrote in the firm’s Out-Law.com news service.
Facebook set up a process by which companies could pre-register their trademarks to stop other people using URLs which were made up of the trademarks.
The company has now written to companies who pre-registered, though, and told them that they cannot protect their intellectual property rights unless they put their firms on Facebook.
“When a username is requested for business or promotional needs, we require it to be associated with a Facebook Page,” said an email sent to those who had tried to use the system and reproduced at Out Law.com. “If you have a Page to claim this username, please provide us with the web address (URL) and we will review your request. If you do not already have a Page, simply click on the ‘Create a page’ link under the Sign Up section of www.facebook.com,” it said.
Pinsent Masons says the policy raises the possibility that companies which thought they had protected their brands from Facebook cybersquatting may now lose that protection.
Out-Law.com says Pinsent Masons asked Facebook if trademarks pre-registered by companies that did not want a Facebook presence would become available for registration by third parties, but that the company did not provide an answer.
The firm also asked Facebook if the supposed trademark protection strategy was in fact a marketing exercise designed to encourage companies to register a Facebook presence, but the company declined to respond. It pointed instead to the ‘frequently asked questions’ page related to the URL policy.
John MacKenzie, an intellectual property specialist at Pinsent Masons, said that the policy will not help those companies which choose to stay off Facebook. "This would appear to be brand protection, but with a catch,” he said. “Unless brands have a clear social networking strategy they will not want to incur the time and cost associated with maintaining a Facebook page. What we need is some clarity as to the protection actually offered and the conditions attached.”
Related Articles
- China, Japan, South Korea to Sign Treaty
- Take Back
Invalidation can be a valuable tool for IP owners to use when defending their patents. Johnny Chan examines useful invalidation strateg...
- The 2013 Asia IP Awards
After months of research, Asia IP will soon reveal the best trademark, patent and copyright practices in Asia. Gregory Glass outlines t...
- Stanislas Barro Has Joined Rouse
- Linh Mai Nguyen Joined Tilleke & Gibbins
- Survey Says Corporate Law Departments Tu...
Law Firms
Hong Kong
Japan
South Korea
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
Taiwan
- DEEP & FAR ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
- GIANT GROUP INTERNATIONAL PATENT, TRADEMARK & LAW FIRM
- LEE AND LI, ATTORNEYS AT LAW
- LEXCEL PARTNERS IP CO., LTD. A MEMBER OF LEXGROUP
- LONG RIVER INTERNATIONAL PATENT & TRAD.
- MISSION INTERNATIONAL PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
- TAI E INTERNATIONAL PATENT & LAW OFFICE
- TSAI LEE & CHEN
Thailand
Vietnam
Indonesia
China
- ADVANCE CHINA I.P. LAW OFFICE
- AFD CHINA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE
- CCPIT PATENT AND TRADEMARK LAW OFFICE
- CHANG TSI & PARTNERS
- CHINA SINDA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
- CHOFN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
- KANGXIN PARTNERS
- KING & WOOD MALLESONS
- LEXFIELD LAW OFFICES
- LIU, SHEN & ASSOCIATES
- PEKSUNG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LTD.
- RAJAH & TANN
- RUN MING
- UNITALEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW
- VOSON FORESTSONG IP AGENCY
Most Read Articles
Magazine Issues
Tags
Baker & McKenzie USPTO WIPO DLA Piper Tilleke & Gibbins Anand and Anand TRIPS Delhi High Court Rouse IPOS Remfry & Sagar Hogan Lovells WTO PCT SIPO Spruson & Ferguson KIPO Bird & Bird Lex Orbis EPO Lall Lahiri & Salhotra Krishna & Saurastri Anaqua INTA IPAB JPO Davies Collison Cave patrick mirandah co King & Wood Mallesons AJ Park Kim & Chang Indian Patent Office Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe Shearn Delamore & Co Deacons Madrid Protocol Tay & Partners Chang Tsi & Partners Pinsent Masons LLS Lee & Ko Khaitan & Co Blake Dawson USTR K&L Gates Drew & Napier TIPO Allen & Gledhill Griffith Hack Lee and Li