Sectors
Jurisdictions
- Australia
- Brunei
- Cambodia
- China
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Japan
- Laos
- Macau
- Malaysia
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- New Zealand
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Sri Lanka
- Taiwan
- Thailand
- Vietnam
- East Timor
- Bangladesh
- Azerbaijan
- Kazakhstan
- Tajikistan
- Egypt
- Cyprus
- Iran
- Israel
- Lebanon
- Kuwait
- Oman
- Jordan
- Bahrain
- Qatar
- Saudi Arabia
- Syria
- UAE
- Turkey
- Pacific Islands
- Russia
- France
- UK
- Canada
- USA
- Latin America
- Africa
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Case Summary: Guess?, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3
Issued: March 04 2019Guess?, Inc, the Opponent, opposed the registration of:
sought to be registered by Jen Chi, (the “Applicant”) for the following goods in Class 25:
Shirts; T-shirts; clothing; skirts; pants; raincoats; boots; shoes; bandanas (neckerchiefs); ties (for wear); hats; socks; gloves (clothing); belts (clothing); coats; aprons (clothing); sleep mask.
One of the main grounds of opposition was Section 8(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act (Cap 332, 2005 Rev Ed). The Opponent relied on its following earlier marks, amongst others:
S/N | Opponent’s Earlier Marks | |
1 |
Opponent’s Earlier Registered Device Mark
|
Class 25 Articles of outer-clothing; vests; underpants and footwear being articles of clothing |
2 |
Opponent’s Earlier Registered GUESS Mark
|
Class 25 Men's, women's and children's outerwear and underwear, jeans, shirts, jackets, vests, pants, sweaters, jumpsuits, shorts, hats, overalls, dresses, skirts, sweatshirts, t-shirts, sweatpants, neckties, brassieres, camisoles, bathing suits, sport coats, suits, robes, pyjamas, belts, briefs, coats, leotards, hosiery, gloves, pantyhose, scarves, ponchos, slips, sun visors, tights and footwear. |
To succeed under section 8(2)(b), the Opponent must establish (among other things) that the Application Mark is similar to the Opponent’s earlier marks. As the Registrar found that the Application Mark is more dissimilar than similar to each of the Opponent’s earlier marks, the opposition under section 8(2)(b) failed.
In view of the finding of dissimilarity, the ground of objection under section 8(4)(b)(i) also failed since one of the elements that must be satisfied is that "the whole or essential part of the trade mark must be identical or similar to an earlier mark". The Registrar was however prepared to hold that the Opponent’s Earlier Registered GUESS Mark is well known in Singapore.
Related Articles
- Norton Rose Fulbright Appoints David Old...
- What Makes a Good Trademark Lawyer?
In honour of the upcoming International Trademark Association meeting in San Diego, Asia IP asked lawyers around Asia and the Paciic wh...
- And The Nominees Are…
Next month, Asia IP will honour the top trademarks, patents and copyright practices in Asia at the ninth Asia IP awards in New Delhi.
- Singapore’s Positive Grant Patent System...
Important changes to Singapore’s patent system came into operation in February. Gladys Mirandah and Jay-R Estavillo explain the changes...
- Intellectual Property Office of Singapor...
- Potential Changes to the Patent Law in S...
The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore has indicated there may be upcoming changes to the Singapore Patents Act. Hubert Giam and...